By: Danny Nicol
I disagree. It is fanciful to suppose that supranational organisations like the EU and WTO can be reformed in the way you propose, Stewart. The very objective of those organisations was to limit...
View ArticleBy: Karl Stewart
Don’t take it personally DavidP, what the Blairites are doing is that they’re trying to set the terms of this debate as “reactionary nationalists versus progressive internationalists”. The struggle...
View ArticleBy: Karl Stewart
This is excellent by the way: “Describing my argument for the management of large-scale population movements across borders as an attempt to trash solidarity with migrants is like describing the...
View ArticleBy: David Pavett
I don’t take the insults personally since they are handed out to anyone who disagrees. At the same time I think we need to try not to do the same thing in return. I am sure that Don Flynn’s concern for...
View ArticleBy: Verity
This is a good argument to question the Left Future’s editorial decisions to be extended the article inclusions too broadly to those who seek to use their success as secondary political advantage –...
View ArticleBy: Peter Rowlands
Yes, Danny Nichol is right in saying that he did not call for a split, and David Pavett was wrong in saying that I did, although I otherwise agree with his remarks. What I did say was that the pursuit...
View ArticleBy: David Pavett
Danny, I agree with a great deal of what you say in your comment although I am perhaps more inclined than you to see shades of grey where you see black and white. I am sorry that I over interpreted...
View ArticleBy: David Pavett
Verity, I am not sure that I fully understand the point you are making. One thing is clear however. You suggest that there is a problem with LF’s editorial decisions. I think that this derives from LF...
View ArticleBy: Danny Nicol
Surely it’s unduly optimistic to suppose the authors of the Momentum coup will have such an attack of power-sharing and broadmindedness. My own Comments on this blog are vetted and censored, and on...
View ArticleBy: David Pavett
Re-reading Don F’s criticism of my original article it strikes me that there are some very powerful, unjustified assumptions at work among the proponents of free movement. (1) Free movement is a...
View Article